“the European Union Collective is considered by the brainwashed German geopolitical élite to be its own global hegemony property and project. Which is precisely correct.”
- sunt si motive de alta natura pentru o relaxare a barierelor dinauntrul Europei. Unul este de ordin economic: pentru o firma nu este acelasi lucru sa aiba la dispozitie o piata de 10 milioane de consumatori sau o piata de 300 de milioane. In mai multe tari s-a simtit nevoia crearii unei piete comune europene, nu doar in Germania. Un alt motiv este de ordin social si a aparut ca urmare a schimbarilor in transporturi: distanta pana la granita in multe localitati este de pana la cateva sute de km iar viteza pe autostrada este de peste 120 km/h.
Ideea unei unificari a Europei este veche, dar nu exclusiv germana. Anglia si Rusia s-au opus unei asemenea eventualitati atunci cand a aparut, aliindu-se intre ele, desi in planul strategiei globale ele au fost tot timpul adversare. O schimbare a survenit in anii ’80, in momentul in care URSS a parut ca agreeaza formula unei integrari europene, simultan manifestand un ciudat dezinteres pentru Europa de Est.

[...]MASSIVE SPLIT BETWEEN THE TREATY OF THE ELYSEE PARTNERS
Now, Germany and France are bound together, as mentioned above, by the Treaty of the Elysée of 23rd January 1963, which contains a key clause requiring that the parties shall achieve a ‘common position’ in respect of all international issues. This treaty, which is of unlimited duration and has no exit clause, is the central layer of glue that binds the fragile pan-German European Union together. It was orchestrated by Dr Konrad Adenauer, the Hitler-era Mayor of Cologne, and the close friend of Hitler’s favourite bankers, Drs. Abs and Pferdmenges, and President Charles de Gaulle.

Since the European Union is the realisation of the Pan-European project that originated under Frederick the Great and was updated in 1941 at a conference attended by highest-level Nazi/Pan-German ‘hoch’ intellectuals which resulted in the publication in 1942 of the strategic compendium called ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (‘the European Economic Community‘), the chapter headings of which coincide almost precisely with those of the EU’s 1992 Maastricht Treaty (4), the European Union Collective is considered by the brainwashed German geopolitical élite to be its own global hegemony property and project. Which is precisely correct.

[...]BROWN SHOULD FREEZE PAYMENTS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
However what Gordon Brown SHOULD do (redeeming himself in the process) in response to such high-handed behaviour from Brussels and the EU Finance Ministers, is to say to them:

‘Right. Since you believe you can order us around, we will show you what we are made of’.

‘I will immediately order all payments to Brussels derived from Value Added Tax to be paid into a suspense account in London, and to be held there until such time as the European Commission puts its own corrupt finances in order, eliminates financial fraud and cronyism from its operations, and has its accounts signed off by the Court of Auditors’.

FACT: For the past 14 years, the EU’s Court of Auditors, which is required to ‘audit’ the European Commission’s accounts, has REFUSED to sign the EC accounts, which have been repeatedly shown to be falsified and riddled with fraud, corruption and creative accounting.

It is an ongoing FILTHY SCANDAL that Britain continues to overlook all this corruption in Brussels. Brown should have the courage of any convictions he may retain, and should make a big play with such an initiative. Paying money into this corrupt sink-hole is a DISGUSTING AFFRONT.

Brown should appear on television to announce that he has ordered all tax collections payable to the European Commission’s accounts to be withheld and paid into a suspense account, and should explain to the British public in forthright terms why he is doing this.

http://worldreports.org/news/178_the_corrupt_octopus_has_been_severely_wounded

“According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed to wither away. ” – da, conform doctrinei marxiste, statul ar trebui sa dispara. Asta cat timp statul este necomunist . Dar, odata veniti la putere, comunistii aplica doctrina in mod ‘dialectic’, adica in acord cu acea logica speciala conform careia un lucru coincide cu opusul sau.
Si, daca luam aminte la aceasta fraza, vedem ca gandirea socialista cuprinde azi si curente din zona ‘de dreapta’.